The
Consequence of Life: Burial
Neanderthals
intentionally buried their dead.
This statement has been controversial ever since the 1908
discovery of a burial at La Chapelle-aux-Saints France. Every detail
of that burial has been questioned skeptically since its discovery,
but an immense 1999-2012 study of Neanderthal burials by New York
University and France's National Center for Scientific Research has
shown that not only was that a burial
but it is by no means the only one or the most complex. Neanderthals
treated their dead unlike any animal before them, understanding why
is key to understanding their mind.
Shanidar Cave, in Iraqi Kurdistan |
At
Shanidar Cave in Iraqi Kurdistan, an adult Neanderthal male was
killed in a rockfall. Near to the rockfall, his family built a small
pile of stones (a tumulus) with some chert stone points placed on
top. They also build a large fire nearby. Another burial at Shanidar
Cave, famously called The Flower Burial,
is a male aged 35-40 years laying on his left side in the fetal
position. His body is surrounded by flower pollen, which were the
remnants of flowers placed around his grave. These were placed there
intentionally, whether
by a Neanderthal or by a Persian jird (a type of gerbil-rodent) is
highly debated. These specific flowers have medicinal properties
which lends weight to the Neanderthal side, yet pollen is strewn
through multiple layers from jird activity...and the consensus (as
far as I can tell) is that team jird has won.
Looking out from the Shanidar Cave |
The dastardly Persian Jird |
At
La Chapelle-aux-Saints, two children and an adult Neanderthal were
buried around 50 kya. Their family dug pits in the cave for the
burials, and the children face each other possibly for ceremonial
reasons. Their bodies are also surrounded by animal bones. For years
people thought the bones and bodies had washed into natural cavities,
but the geology “cannot be explained by natural
events...there is no sign of weathering and scavenging by animals.”
-William Rendu. This is a sign
that the bodies were immediately covered after burial, lending
serious weight to the idea of a burial practice.
The adult has a tumulus of stones built on top of its grave, stones
which came from outside the cave.
A Neanderthal burial at La Ferrassie cave included a large stone slab
over the body. All of these items of evidence: the immediate covering
of the body, the creation of a tumulus, and funerary slabs are
examples of burial practices. This behavioral phenomenon requires a
complexity of thought presumed to have been uniquely human.
The Neanderthal burial site at La Chapelle-aux-Saints cave, France |
Le
Regourdou
The
most impressive Neanderthal burial is at Le Regourdou cave. Here, a
Neanderthal was buried (around 70 kya) surrounded by stone points and
brown bear bones. This burial has some of the best evidence for grave
goods, the stone points were
possibly weapons, and the brown bear bones were possibly hunting
trophies or trinkets. The human practice of leaving grave goods is
tied to the idea of an afterlife and symbolic reasoning. If
Neanderthals left grave goods, were they thinking the same thoughts?
There are 33 known Neanderthal burials, with more than half
associated with stone tools or animal bones, and at La Ferrassie cave
a bone fragment has a series of intentional parallel cuts. “Grave
goods may or may not relate to metaphysical notions of an afterlife
or bodily extension; they probably speak more of self-expression and
concepts of ownership. It may well be that neither existed in
Neanderthal societies.” -Paul
Pettitt.
Le Regourdou Cave under excavation in 1964 |
The
uniqueness of this burial does not end there, on top of the grave is
a giant (850 kg/1870 lbs) limestone slab, a true funeral
slab. Built on the slab was a
tumulus of large stones, and on top of that
was a layer of burnt sand and various artifacts including more brown
bear bones. Regourdou is the first tomb.
Yet the strangeness does not even end there.
Around the grave are about 20 man-made ditches. These are either
lined, filled, or covered with stones, and their purpose is unknown.
The only clue is one such small ditch, carefully lined with stones
and covered with a limestone slab and a tumulus. Inside, is a nearly
complete brown bear skeleton. “It is difficult to see how
this could be a natural accumulation.” -Eugene
Bonifay. The entire grave site is spectacular. It includes a
Neanderthal tomb complete with grave goods and a fire ritual, along
with multiple brown bear tombs. This burial is radically
different than other
Neanderthal burials, possibly connoting an elevated social status or
the individual's symbolic relation to bears. Who was this person? Who
took the time to built such an elaborate tomb, complete with little
bear tombs? Since Neanderthals came together in extended clan groups
of up to 40, it is possible that this Neanderthal was the leader of
one such group. It is also just as possible that this Neanderthal's
clan of 8-15 took years or decades to build the tomb. This tomb
raises many strange and unforeseen questions...is this evidence of a
social hierarchy? What relation did bears have to this person? How
did Neanderthals lift a funeral slab weighing around 1900 pounds?
Explaining this tomb is the deepest mystery in all of anthropology.
Brown Bears are kept at the Regourdou site as a tourist attraction |
How
Neanderthals Treated Death
In
general, most Neanderthal burials are simple compared to ours, and
were “body-centered” -Jean-Jacques
Hublin. The most locationally unique Neanderthal burial is at Sima de
los Huesos Spain, where deep within the cave around 30 bodies were
tossed into shafts as a burial. This occurred around 500 kya, and is
disputed whether these were Neanderthals or Heidelbergensis. The
first undisputed burial evidence is from around 90 kya. Most burials
are shallow graves dug into soft midden soil, near the living areas
at the mouths of caves and rock shelters. While originally burials
were not separated from the rest of a site, at Kebara cave there is
evidence that bodies were buried deeper within the cave over time.
Eventually Neanderthals began to associate certain areas of a cave
with burials. Neanderthals tended to bury their dead within the cave
or by the entrance, whereas humans mainly buried their dead by the
entrance or on the terrace of caves.
Kebara Cave, at Mount Carmel, Israel |
While
many bodies were put in a fetal position, not all were. Some bodies
had bones stained with hematite (rust-red iron ore), which was either
sprinkled or painted on the body (when mixed with vegetable seed oil
or animal fat). There is evidence of defleshing at burials, either
for ritual or for cannibalism. Sometimes a body was disarticulated to
fit in a grave. At Mount Cerceo Italy around 57 kya, a Neanderthal's
head was bashed in to reveal the brains, and the hole was later
enlarged and the edges smoothed so it could be used as a bowl. Other
evidence of cannibalism points towards a general similarity with
animal butchery, like at El Sidron cave in Spain a family of 12 was
overwhelmed by another clan, killed, and eaten. While funerary slabs
show respect for the dead, cannibalism shows that sentimentality was
fleeting and at times hunger prevailed.
Mount Cerceo, Lazio, Italy |
The
construction of tombs and nutritional cannibalism were not practiced
everywhere at all times. Neanderthal burial practices were just as
varied as contemporaneous human burials. There were burials of
individuals (sometimes only parts of individuals) and burials of
groups. Groups were either buried at the same time (as in La
Ferrassie), or not (as in Shanidar). Most burials were dug into the
cave floor, but some used natural fissures or depressions, and some
even widened natural pits. Strangely enough, at some places bones
were unceremoniously pushed away from the living space, not even
buried at all. “Aquitaine and Levant contain relatively
large numbers of burials as well as places of multiple burial, which
might suggest that burial was practiced more widely in these areas
and that, by contrast, Neanderthals in other regions either did not
bury their dead, or did not practice it frequently.”
-Paul Pettitt. A universal feature is that children and infants were
given more elaborate burials, and there was no distinction between
male and female burials. While the most famous burials are within
caves, just as many burials were by rock shelters. “If
there was any general means of disposal of the dead in Neanderthal
society we shall never recapture it as it is obviously
archaeologically invisible.” -Paul
Pettitt.
Illustration of the burial of Ferrassie 5, including the stone points associated with the burial as grave goods. By Emmanuel Roudier |
If
there is any rhyme or reason to the location of Neanderthal burials,
it may be due to inter-clan competition. “These are
regions...that Neanderthals were particularly numerous, and it is
tempting to suggest that the practice of burial may have been
connected to population size and perhaps to a sense of
territoriality.” -Paul
Pettitt. While this is an interesting thought, since we only have
around 30 burials of a species which included millions of individuals
over hundreds of thousands of years, the most insightful burials have
probably not even been found. We do know that they continued burying
their dead up until the last Neanderthal.
There
was no single Neanderthal mindset towards burial. Their treatment of
the dead exists in a gray area between elaborate stone tombs and no
burial at all. While tombs and grave goods are reflective of the idea
of an afterlife, “...as if they recognized some stage
after death.” -Eric Delson,
cannibalism and the lack of burial signify that bodies immediately
lost their connection to the individual. Tombs and grave goods may
only signify memorials and the idea of individual possession, not
symbolizing an afterlife at all. Since there is so much local
variation, it is possible that some Neanderthals recognized an
afterlife and other did not. The understanding of an afterlife may
have been a cultural trait, passed down from generation to generation
within a family group. If Neanderthal linguistic variation was
centered around the family unit, it is conceivable that cultural
variation in burial practices were also. The burial at Le Regourdou
is the most confusing...what was the connection between that
individual and brown bears, and why did that connection have to be
formalized in death? We will never know for sure.
The
Cult of the Cave Bear
A sketch of a Neanderthal next to cave bears, by Emmanuel Roudier |
The
connection between bears and Neanderthals is not isolated to Le
Regourdou. In the early 20th
century, there were multiple discoveries of cave bear bones in
strange positions, the most famous of which is Drachenloch cave.
Drachenloch was famously excavated by Emil Bachler and Theophil Nigg.
At the time their discoveries were revolutionary, but in the
intervening years everything they did has been disavowed and undone
by the archeological community.
Drachenloch Cave |
They found cave bear bones placed in strange positions,
surrounded by stones. They found ditches filled with bear bones and
topped with slabs. They found a cave bear skull with a bone stuck
through its cheek, and skulls placed on top of rocks. As it turns
out, cave bears scratch out nests, making bones and small rocks
collect in crevices. Those bones and rocks are then saved from
erosion, giving the impression that they were placed there. Due to
rockfalls, large slabs then fall on collections of bones, forming the
impression of a burial. With thousands of bones in a single cave, and
thousands of years of bear activity, it is not impossible that one
bone would be lodged through another.
The infamous cave bear skull |
Emil
Bachler began his excavation already believing in the cult of the
cave bear and didn't leave detailed records of context. He wasn't
even there most of the time. The lead excavator Theophil Nigg was
there most of the time and his notes completely contradict Bachler's.
Bachler said that the bear graves were “obviously
man-made”, had slabs laying on
them, and that small walls were associated with the bear graves.
Nigg's notes report the exact opposite of all these claims.
“It was a small chamber with sloping walls...the bears...dug out their lair, forming, with the complicity of the sloping walls, the most beautiful trap for prehistorians one could imagine. When the overlying material had been removed, the little chamber was surrounded by a circle of bear skulls, oriented in all directions, but for the most part horizontal and lying in place...The work of the bears and the unconscious elimination of all the little bones had sufficed to produce a structure such that one could hardly doubt the intervention of man.” -Andre Leroi-Gourhan (speaking about the cave at Les Furtins)
The
idea that Neanderthals had a cave bear based religion was popular in
academic circles throughout the 1960s and 70s, and popularized by the
book The Clan of the Cave Bear.
While many parts of that book still stand...the Neanderthals have
names which include bilabial phonemes, and only use sign language
(the book was written in 1980, and the Neanderthal hyoid bone was
found in 1983). The cult of the cave bear has also not stood up to
modern research. Reality is much more ridiculous than fiction, the
true meaning of the actual
bear graves at Le Regourdou is completely unknown. While Drachenloch
is a Neanderthal
burial, the fantasies of Emil Bachler live on into the 21st
century.
“All relevant conceptions of that kind are either products of a certain mental climate at the time of the discovery of the fossils or of ideologies...the discussion of religious customs among recent hunter gatherers proves that what remains of the practice of their cult differs markedly from the fossil remains found in the Mousterian bear caves. An examination of fossil bone formations...makes clear that supposed ancient bear cult sites are bone beds of natural origin. The characteristic appearance of the sites is a result of the activities of the bears themselves and of geological and sedimentary processes.” -Ina Wunn
Ina Wunn |
No comments:
Post a Comment