What
do you see when you look at the object above? In one view, it is
completely unremarkable. It is simply a stone cutting tool used be
prehistoric people, a basic technology made by hitting rocks with
other rocks. Stonework like this is our first, and our least complex
technology. Switching to another view, it is completely unlike any
other stone tool you've ever seen. Your eyes have already spotted the
fossil in the center of the piece. This tool was designed to cut
things, but it was also designed for you to see that fossil. The
stone from which this was made was chipped away in such a manner as
to bring that fossil to the surface. The fossil was not only
intentionally revealed, but was intentionally centered so as to draw
your focus. This simple hand axe raises a difficult question: Does
this object look beautiful?
I'm
curious as to what people today see in this object because I hope it
can shed light on a related, yet much more difficult question. You
see, there is a problem – this hand axe found in Norfolk England
was not made by the English, I'm not asking whether we see
this as beautiful, because we didn't make it. It
was made around 200,000 years ago by a Neanderthal. Special rocks,
such as this, were traded between far flung Neanderthal groups,
sometimes 100-200 miles. It is revealing that regular old hand axes
were not traded in this way, they did not have the same value. The
question I really want to know is why. Why
did Neanderthals incorporate fossils into their hand axes? What made
these hand axes so different than all the others, what was their
extra-ordinary value?
Those
questions hinge on Neanderthal behavior, the question can be
reformatted as: What is it about their behavior which
motivated them to incorporate fossils into objects. This
question relies on a simple premise, that their physical
behavior is indicative of mental behavior.
Neanderthals treated these rocks differently because they
thought about them differently. This
is the deeper question I'm trying to ask: What did a
Neanderthal see when they looked at this hand axe? Did they, as we
might now, see something aesthetically pleasing or beautiful?
This is partially an impossible question, as it asks for
facts about the mental phenomena of long dead individuals in a long
dead species. This question may at first glance seem unanswerable,
but that premise is not my starting point. If such questions were
outright unanswerable then the discussion would promptly cease. While
I obviously cannot answer questions about the Neanderthal mind with
scientific assurance, I will try to get as close to answering them as
I can. To construct a lexicon of the Neanderthal mental capacity
necessitates understanding their behavioral repertoire...all of which
requires an extreme amount of context! To slow chip away at the
obfuscated mountain of the Neanderthal mind, we must be cognizant of
their behavior, physiology, culture, and genome. Hopefully, employing
context can reveal which Neanderthal behaviors necessitate certain
thoughts. So let us begin...
Chris Stringer's hypothesis of the family tree of the genus Homo, published 2012 |
Models of three hominin faces. Homo Erectus (left), Homo Heidelbergensis (center), and Homo Neanderthalensis (right). By Paleoartist John Gurche |
The
easiest way to comprehend such large scales of time is through the
notation kya (thousand
years ago). Compared to the present, I was born 0.025 kya. The first
World War began 0.1 kya, and Columbus led Europeans to the New World
0.5 kya. 1 kya Byzantine Orthodoxy and Roman Catholicism split as the
Pope and Patriarch excommunicated each other, and 2 kya the Roman
Emperor Tiberius was purging his Praetorian guard wholly unconcerned
with the crucifixion of radical preachers in Judaea. Mentioned in my
previous post, the first human megalith at Gobekli Tepe was
constructed around 11.5 kya. Homo Sapiens Neanderthalensis
existed from around 250-28 kya.
We split from a common ancestor around 400-350 kya, most likely from
Homo Heidelbergensis. Oh,
who could guess where Homo Heidelbergensis was
first discovered? Heidelbergensis originated around 1,300-800 kya and
lived til around 200 kya, ranging over eastern/southern Africa,
Europe, and western Asia. As groups of Heidelbergensis became more
and more spread out across their landscape, their lineage began to
diverge. Around 400-350 kya African Heidelbergensis started to make
physiological moves towards modern humans. It was around the same
time when the Eurasian branch started to move towards Neanderthals.
Heidelbergensis also spawned Denisovans in the modern day steppes of
Russia, and a fourth unknown lineage presumably in south-east Asia.
The evolution and timeline of early Hominins |
Giving
such precise dates as 250-28 kya is
completely impossible. Many people debate both
of those numbers. The first emergence of Neanderthals is impossible
to pin down – all we have are a collection of Neanderthal traits
emerging around 300-200 kya, with Neanderthals becoming genetically
distinct between 400-300 kya. The last Neanderthals are also
impossible to pin down, generally they died out around 40-28 kya,
completely depending on which carbon dating results you accept. The
assumption that Homo Heidelbergensis is
our common ancestor with Neanderthals is also up in the air: a recent
study from 2013 which examined 1200 molars from 13 hominin species
found results contradictory to anthropological orthodoxy. “None
of the species that have been previously suggested as the last common
ancestor of Neanderthals and modern humans has a dental morphology
that is fully compatible with the expected morphology of this
ancestor.” -Aida Gomes-Robles.
The species thrown out are all of the common suspects:
Heidelbergensis, Homo Erectus, Homo Antecessor. This would suggest
that our common ancestor with Neanderthals existed more than 1
million years ago, instead of 300-400 kya. “The study
tells us that there are still new hominin finds waiting to be
made...fossil finds from about 1 million years ago in Africa deserve
close scrutiny as the possible ancestor of Neanderthals and modern
humans.” -David Polly. Now it
would be unreasonable to radically alter our timeline from one study,
but the gist is that it's complicated. For
now, I will assume the general timeline and that Heidelbergensis is
our common ancestor with Neanderthals.
The range of Homo Sapiens Neanderthalensis (or is it Homo Neanderthalensis?) |
Northwest Europe during the Paleolithic period, showing its radically different shoreline. The present shoreline of Europe did not become recognizable until about 9 kya |
During
their lifetime, Neanderthals ranged throughout central Asia and
Europe. The Neanderthal population was spread out unevenly, with the
greatest amount of contact between groups in central Asia. This is
because this area shows the greatest diversity in Neanderthal DNA,
giving evidence to idea that their homeland was in Asia with
occasional branches entering Europe. How in the world can we say
anything about Neanderthal DNA? Surprisingly enough we can say a lot,
their genes tell a strange and previously unknown story which has
only recently been deciphered. Svante Paabo (Svante Pรครคbo)
started working with DNA in 1981, extracting samples from Egyptian
mummies. No one thought it was possible to get a real workable
sample, but he did. He moved on to extracting DNA from extinct cave
bears and ground sloths, which again no one thought would be
possible. He proved them wrong. Moving on from extinct bears to
extinct hominins, most recently in 2010 Svante Paabo and colleagues
(56 other researchers) at the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary
Anthropology uncovered the Neanderthal genome. In 2013 they
discovered all 3 billion base pairs, and since then research has been
slowly piecing together the consequence of this discovery. This
groundbreaking research from 2006-2010 catapulted him to fame. Now
(in 2014) we can read the Neanderthal genome side by side to our own,
an insane feat of modern science thought impossible merely 10 years
ago. If Neanderthals became genetically distinct from our common
ancestor between 400-300 kya, how has the intervening years changed
their genome?
This is just the perfect article! Everything is totally right in this article. I cannot find anything wrong with this. Thank you very much for providing this amazing stuff to us! MOM Canada
ReplyDeleteI truly delighted in the quality data you offer to your guests for this site. I will bookmark this page for my future reference. Much appreciated. Buy Oral Steroids
ReplyDelete