By
the EM period (3,000-2,000
BCE) the production of
certain material activities had become separated from the general
population, and the producers of such items can be termed artisans.
The genesis of an entire class of such people was cemented in Minoan
society in the MM and LM periods. The creation
of an artisan class led to
precious objects being worked
by professionals for
their livelihood. The rise of
such a class was likely tied to international trade, as local
experts'
wares were going not only to the nobility in Crete but to
those who could afford it around
the eastern Mediterranean.
|
A Minoan axe head mold from the MM period |
Around the start of the MM
period in nearby Mesopotamia the notion of an artisan was evolving
simultaneously. In the northern Mesopotamian town of Titris most
crafts were still done at home by the whole family, such as: pottery,
stoneworking, or metalworking. By this time certain tasks were being
done in specialized workshops either in a specific location in town
or outside the city. Specifically these early Mesopotamian artisans
were working in textiles and flint knapping. Mesopotamia is an
interesting parallel, but such early detail is not known for the
development of Cretan artisanry by the MM period.
|
Minoan potter and kiln, in the south stoa of building T, Kommos, Crete |
The general trend was that
certain difficult tasks were siphoned off to specific people who were
experienced aficionados in operating with that object. People like
doing specific things, and in a world where most of your daily use
objects were made by your family, certain people enjoyed and were
better at doing certain crafts. While the average commoner would pass
their skills down to their children (presumably), these experts would
have become well known and been flooded with aspiring apprentices.
Parents still compete to send their children to experts in order to
learn some useful skill, that human phenomenon is still rife in all
urban societies today. Urban artisans were often grouped into
sections of towns, most likely from devotees tending to live nearby
their master or by a royal decree. Highly skilled artisans in each
town likely vied for influence among the local ruling class, as
during the Italian Renaissance 3,500 years later, temple painting and
noble patronage were paramount to an artist's fame and success. Not
every artist was painting frescoes in the palace-temple, the majority
of artisans made pottery or tools for commoners.
|
A cup with reed decorations, from Knossos |
Throughout the EM period
artisans were not confined to a quarter in town or in the temple, and
were dispersed throughout cities and the countryside. With the rise
of the temple hierarchy the lives of artisans changed, and during the
MM period at Mallia artisans became confined to one quarter of the
town, Quarter Mu. At Knossos by 1,700 BCE specific artisans were
confined in the temple. While it is not known if the other Minoan
cities had artisanal quarters, it is likely that the palace-temple
concocted some manner of oversight. The close contact between
artisanal excellence and the wealth of local nobility continues
throughout the remainder of the bronze age.
|
A woman (priestess or goddess) on a swing, from Agia Triadha, 1,450-1,300 BCE |
Stone
and Bronze
|
A stone goblet from Zakros |
By the MM and LM periods
expert artisans had a place in their society comparable to modern
artists. Artisan workshops existed for any and all materials,
completely woven into the fabric of daily life for commoners and the
nobility alike. Specialization created a multiplicity of different
workshops: lapidaries for gemstones, bronze smiths, seal carvers,
ivory carvers, faience workers, and stone carvers who worked with
many varieties including rock crystal.
|
Minoan gypsum vase manufacture diagram |
|
Rock crystal rhyton from Zakro, 1,700-1,400 BCE |
|
Stone chalice from Zakro, 1,700-1,450 BCE |
|
A pouring bowl with a duck head handle, made of rock crystal and found in grave circle B at Mycenae, 1,600-1,500 BCE. This piece's origination is disputed, but even if it is Mycenaean such expert rock crystal artisans on Crete most likely made similar objects |
|
The Bull Head rhyton from Knossos. Carved out of stone, the horns were probably gilded wood, its eyes had painted irises, its eyelashes are jasper, and its muzzle is tridacna shell |
|
A stone lamp from Mallia |
|
A marble Minoan bowl |
|
A dolomitic limestone bowl, from Khania, Crete |
|
A highly decorated stone axe head from Mallia, Crete, 1,600-1,500 BCE |
Bronze smiths made a diverse
variety of items, such as: weapons, tools, utensils, votive
figurines, mirrors, as well as vases and pots. While no such metal
pots have been found, there have been many clay pots found with
designs mimicking bronze rivets and chain links. Bronze smiths also
made jewelry, and bronze bracelets were popularly worn from central
Europe through mainland Greece. While no such bronze bracelets from
Crete survive it is highly likely they were made considering they are
found in the Mycenaean material world. Decorated examples from across
Europe show that the local bronze smith was not only a weapons
craftsman, but a creative and inventive artist as well.
|
A diagram of Minoan metal tools |
|
A similar Mycenaean bronze double axe and pickaxe, 1,550-1,500 BCE |
|
A copper spouted cup from LM IIIB period (1,300-1,200 BCE) |
|
A metal pot from LM III A-B periods (1,400-1,200 BCE) |
|
A bronze Mycenaean arm band from Kadmeia, the citadel of Thebes, from 1,370-1,300 BCE |
The Mycenaean bronze armlet from Thebes is in fact much more ornamental than other bronze armlets seen across Europe in the late bronze age.
|
A bronze bracelet from Germany, 1,250 BCE |
|
A bronze bracelet from Halstatt, Austria, 1,100-1,300 BCE |
|
A bronze bracelet from central Europe, made around 1,000 BCE |
Gold
In Minoan culture, wearing
gold and silver jewelry was not reserved for one gender. This high
demand across the entire island by every noble created a dense market
and severe competition. Gold artisans operated on very small scales,
creating fine precision in necklaces and rings. Often the items
required multiple precious materials, although it is unknown whether
a single artisan would do this work or multiple artisans would
collaborate. Multiple styles of gold and lapis lazuli rings are found
in the Aegina treasure, each with a different and unique aesthetic
style.
|
A Minoan gold and lapis lazuli ring, 1,850-1,550 BCE |
|
A ring in the shape of a shield or double axe, from the treasure of Aegina, Minoan |
|
A ring with a knot design made of gold and lapis lazuli, from the Aegina treasure, Minoan |
|
A ring with a meander design made of gold and lapis lazuli, from the Aegina treasure, Minoan |
|
Minoan necklaces from Arkhanes, Crete |
|
Gold and rock crystal necklaces from Agia Triadha, LMI period |
|
Two necklaces from the Aegina treasure, Minoan, the bottom one is made of gold and the top one is made of gold, carnelian, and jasper |
|
Gold earring from the treasure of Aegina, of Minoan craftsmanship |
Gold was not only used for
jewelry, but fine inlays decorated the swords as well. Gold artisans
also made elaborate inlays on hilts and hammered miniature designs
into round gold crossguards. Small gold objects were found throughout
the graves at Mycenae and at the treasure of Aegina. A few of these
small gold objects show specific motifs shared with classical Greek
art, such as the meander design in a ring and two owl pendants.
Certain objects such as the ivory bull leaper figurine included both
careful gold working as well as masterful ivory carving. Both of
which are difficult tasks to individually perfect and suggests that
at least some high quality objects were combinatorial efforts between
multiple experts, likely being commissioned or planned by
palace-temple patronage.
|
Gold necklace beads of lions and bull heads, from Agia Triadha, 1,350-1,300 BCE |
|
A gold bead in the shape of a duck, from Knossos |
|
A gold bracelet from Mochlos, Crete, 2,500-2,000 BCE |
|
A gold leaf attachment to the gold diadem from Mochlos, Crete, 2,500-2,000 BCE |
|
A gold necklace bead with cylindrical design, from Kalathiana of Mesara, Crete |
|
The gold crossguard with an acrobat, Minoan |
|
A small flat gold tripartite shrine from grave circle A at Mycenae, most likely Minoan craftsmanship and made between 1,600-1,500 BCE |
|
Multiple small gold items found by Heinrich Schliemann at Mycenae |
|
Two gold pendants in the shape of owls, from the Aegina treasure, Minoan |
|
A gold bee pendant from Mallia, Crete, 1,800-1,700 BCE |
There was significant overlap
between individual artisans and styles between Crete and mainland
Greece. A trove of gold objects found on the island of Aegina off the
coast of Greece was first presumed to be Mycenaean, but the pieces
are much more in common with Minoan styles. These pieces were made by
either local Greeks familiar with Minoan designs, acquired from
Minoans by trade, or by were made by traveling hired (or captive)
Minoan artisans. Some pieces, like the “Master of Animals” shows
Egyptian influences as well, and some pieces may have been uniquely
Mycenaean such as the circular decorated gold plaques. Detailed,
complex, and elaborate gold pieces have been found on both the
mainland and Crete, and many pieces share common motifs (like
rosettes). Minoan artists were hired on commission by Egyptian
rulers, certainly similar situations would have occurred between
Greeks and Minoans. Whether these expert gold smiths received foreign
commissions is unknown, although certainly fresco painting and gold
working were the two artisanal trades most closely connected to the
nobility.
|
Gold pendant of the figure called “Master of the Animals”, from the Aegina treasure, Minoan, 1,700-1,500 BCE |
|
A gold plaque with a rosette design from Mycenae, made around 1,500 BCE |
|
A gold baldric (shoulder belt for a sword) with rosettes from shaft grave IV at Mycenae |
|
A gold bracelet with a spiral rosette from shaft grave V, Mycenae, from around 1,500 BCE |
|
A black and white picture of another gold bracelet with a flower rosette from circle A, tomb IV, Mycenae, 1,550-1,500 BCE |
|
A color photo of that gold bracelet with a flower rosette |
|
Gold
necklace attachments in the shape of a bull's head, 1,350-1,300 BCE,
from Agia Triadha
|
|
Minoan artists also copied Egyptian forms, as seen in this gold pendant falcon, NT period |
Mirrors
People enjoy looking at their
reflections, and this desire to see oneself and beautify oneself
compelled artisans to create mirrors. While most mirrors during the
bronze age were made of bronze, other materials worked just as well
if not better. The earliest mirrors in the middle east come from
Catalhoyuk and are from around 6,000 BCE. These mirrors were 9cm long
polished obsidian disks, and were very effective for their purpose.
The use of such a precious and difficult material necessitated these
objects being the playthings of the wealthy in neolithic near eastern
society. Prior to the copper age most people could easily obtain
mirrors through using reflective water. These mirrors would use any
wetted dark polished stone or ceramic bowl which was filled with
water or oil. Even after rise of copper/bronze mirrors, such simple
reflective mirrors are still common. It is assumed that various
ceramic “frying pan” objects from the Cyclades contemporaneous to
the EM period on Crete were most likely this style of early mirror.
These objects have a small lip along the edge, allowing the interior
to be filled with the reflective liquid.
|
A person reflected in an obsidian mirror from Catalhoyuk |
|
A Cycladic “frying pan” terracotta piece of unknown function, from Chalandriani Syros, 2,500-2,200 BCE |
The first metal mirrors in
the near east were polished copper disks from the Uruk period in
Mesopotamia and during the Pre-Dynsatic period in Egypt, during the
1,000 years prior to the EM period. Specialized metal working
eventually spread to Crete, with metal mirrors appearing during the
EM period made of gold, tin, copper, or silver. Of these materials,
silver was the most reflective, moreso than bronze. By 2,600 BCE the
best metal mirrors were being produced with an alloy of bronze, using
6-15% tin. This new bronze quickly eclipsed previously popular
mirrors made of arsenical copper. It was not only more reflective
than previous EM period mirror, but it was cheaper to manufacture as
well. Before this development, people had to be able to afford
expensive silver or copper designs in order to have a fine mirror.
With this technological revolution metal mirrors had become
democratized amongst the EM elite. The new style also involved
casting the whole object in a single mold, then allowing the liquid
metal to settle which forms a curved reflective surface when cooled.
Even if the most reflective surface known to artisans of the period
was still silver, the previously excluded group now holding bronze
mirrors in their hands did not seem to mind.
|
An Egyptian New Kingdom period bronze mirror cast in one piece in a similar manner to Minoan mirrors, 1,570-1,070 BCE |
Minoan artisans most
likely experimented with the ratios between copper and tin. Each
differing ratio changes the reflectivity, with 8% tin creating less
reflection and 20% tin much more. High levels of tin with bronze
creates a material called speculum which usually has 33-45% tin, with
this level of reflectivity it almost looks like silver. In addition
to resembling silver it is also resistant to tarnishing. Although no
speculum mirrors have been found, it is likely that they were made
considering the huge desirability of silver mirrors among both elites
and commoners alike.
Other
Crafts
Glass faience working was
first imported into Crete from Egypt around 2,000 BCE. Originally it
was only used for pendants and beads, but eventually people were
creating vases, statuettes, and plaques. The most elaborate faience
objects found on Crete are from the repositories in the west wing of
the Knossian labyrinth. The snake goddess figurines and votive
dresses were all faience, and made by masters in their craft.
|
A reconstruction of the inside of a Knossian faience workshop |
|
A faience snake goddess figurine from Knossos |
|
A faience plaque of a wild goat from the Snake Goddess Sanctuary at Knossos, made between 1,700-1,600 BCE |
|
Another faience plaque of a wild goat from the Snake Goddess Sanctuary at Knossos, made between 1,700-1,600 BCE |
At times multiple crafts were
combined into composite works of art, such as with damascening which
was perfected and used on some swords. This process consists of
finely inlaying silver and gold threads into bronze along with
patches of black enamel. Shell carving as an art form was developed
by the Cycladic culture prior to the MM period focusing on figurines
and bracelets. By the NT period Minoan society had adopted this skill
and perfected its aesthetic power. Shell inlays were routinely
integrated by design into wooden chests and furniture of the wealthy.
Ivory carving was also used to decorate wooden chests and other
pieces of furniture, and the gaming or divination board from the east
wing of Knossos is a prime example of the Minoan's expertise in what
was originally most likely a Syrian craft.
|
The gaming or divination board from the east wing of Knossos |
The board is covered in
plaques of ivory and crystal, plated in gold, all stuck together with
silver and blue paste. In a similar fashion to miniature fresco
painting, miniature ivory pieces have been found. At Phaistos such
tiny carvings include a bull's leg, and a lion's head with gold mane.
At Zakro ivory pieces in the shape of double axes were found. By the
late NT period artisans were commonly carving even larger ivory
pieces, and this tradition of combining both ivory and gold never
died out along with the Minoans, but was passed down into the CP.
That remarkable fact truly shows the power which expert artisans had
on society: their influence and craft being so beautiful, valued, and
powerful, that specific skills passed from expert to novice could
outlast is originating culture entirely. Cretans could forget their
history, language, writing, and deities, but could not forget gold
and ivory artisanal techniques.
|
A detailed image of the Minoan divination gaming board and its pieces |
|
A painted plaster reproduction of the gaming board |
Vases were commonplace, and
as they were such a ubiquitous item with an abundance of craftsmen,
their artistic quality was highly intricate and their market highly
competitive. Some of these expertly made vases still exist, such as:
The Harvester Vase, Boxer Vase, and the Chieftain's Vase. They were
made out of a variety of materials, sometimes using extremely hard
rock, and other times clay. Likely artisans specialized in one type
of material.
|
Plaster and wood reproduction of the Harvesters Vase, by Gillieron and his son. On the left the bottom half is left unreconstructed, on the right they added their imagined version |
|
Full picture of the Harvesters Vase |
|
The Chieftain's cup |
|
The boxer wearing a smooth helmet from the Boxer Vase |
|
A “fruit bowl” with a toothed rim, Kamares Ware, Minoan |
|
A Minoan goblet with attached sculpted flowers, made around 1,700 BCE |
Both wood and bronze
furniture were extremely common and were also finely crafted, yet
such fragile pieces rarely survive. This conundrum leaves modern
archeologists with a smidgeon of the full abundance of such rich
items. The Minoans also used sponges to fill their pillows and
mattresses, and possibly also used sponges for painting. While this
may seem odd, our current tradition involves plucked animal feathers.
|
A plaster cast of an ornate wooden table which was covered in ash from the Theran eruption, from Akrotiri. This piece of furniture is the only wooden object of its kind found from the Minoan civilization, its existence shows a highly developed woodworking industry even in Minoan colonies |
|
Another example of a wooden table is seen on the Agia Triadha sarcophagus. Such wooden tables designed for sacrifices would have been commonplace but none have survived |
|
A diagram of Minoan wood working tools |
Pottery
The
earliest style of pottery is Pirgos ware. Imported to Crete around
2,700 BCE from the Cyclades, it resembled mainland neolithic pottery
but its styles birthed the industry on the island. Within 200 years
By 2,500 BCE a new styles had appeared such as Agios Onoufrios and
Vasiliki ware, along with innovative shapes such as bird or animal
form pottery. At some point right before the first great temples and
the MM period, the potter's fast wheel and kilns are invented. These
two innovations exacerbated the explosion in growth. It is not known
whether these innovations were spurred from the growth in urbanism or
results of novel urban intellectual contact. Potters could now create
significant amounts of highly similar pots, and more easily create a
signature style. Certainly the wealth and popularity of potters who
had caught on to such technologies increased. Commoners in an urban
setting also needed pottery as much as their rural counterparts, and
an immense market was primed for prospective businessmen. Every
household needed multiple bowls, cups, cooking jars, storage jars,
washing basins, toys, and lamps, many people would want bath tubs
although it is unknown how many had such luxury.
|
Minoan handled jar |
|
A clay box in the shape of a boat from Akrotiri, LM period |
Kamares
ware was most likely invented at Phaistos, directly following the
birth of urban temples and the fast wheel. This pottery was unique in
that it is only found in OT palaces, its use was reserved for the
elite. This was the first time on Crete that a distinct style of
pottery had been completely monopolized by a class. Its creation was
spurred on by both urban nobles who wanted distinctive and unique
possessions, and the highly competitive world of urban potters with
fast wheels. The artisans who created this style used delicate care
in creating eggshell thin walls for cups, some down to 1mm wide.
|
Kamares ware cups from dartmouth.edu |
|
A Kamares wear spouted cup from Phaistos, MM I-II period |
Potters
of the OT period also developed styles which resembled metal pots,
such as placing unnecessary clay “rivets” on pots. This fashion
would stay popular through to the NT period, as potters around 1,500
BCE perfected metal mimicry with the tortoise shell ripple effect
(resembling the rippling of metal). While it seems unusual that
potters would recreate metal pots with clay, they were in effect
creating cheap knock-offs of high status goods. The tastes of the
nobility through their bronze and silver cups were filtered down to
rural areas from the fashionable urban palaces. Commoners desired
these aesthetically appealing objects, and potters wanting to cash in
on the latest trends fulfilled that desire.
Homer
mentions the wealthy owning bronze cauldrons, which have been found
across the LBA Aegean. These large, heavy, and valuable objects were
de facto methods of storing wealth, and were even traded as an
extremely awkward form of currency. While high status items often
showed your wealth, bronze cauldrons also stored that wealth and in
turn became an exclusively high class object. The popularity of such
items by the rich also spurred potters to create terracotta metal
mimics, allowing a merchant or farmer to own a knock-off bronze
cauldron of their own.
|
A reproduction of the Kamares ware “Lily Vase”, 1,700-1,550 BCE |
As
the use of Kamares ware flourished among the wealthy on Crete,
potters experimented with other types of scenes. Some would
incorporate elaborately decorated animals onto
their work,
creating a fanciful new styles which arose to rival Kamares' refined
elegance. NT period pottery includes the new Marine, Floral, and Sea
Life styles. Beginning around 1,600 BCE many potters began to
incorporate more images of oceanic animals into their works, creating
a style of bright colorful and playful designs in contrast to the
darker contrasts of red, white, and black on Kamares ware. Around
this period Minoan merchants were at their peak, travel across the
Aegean at least. Possibly more people had experience with sea life,
which drew more potters to experiment with its incorporation into
art.
|
Three pieces of pottery with elaborate sea scenes, from Santorini |
|
A Minoan pithos jar with dolphins |
In
addition to animal scenes, two other styles were invented in the NT
period: the Marine and Floral styles. Each had a unique aesthetic
standing in contrast to the now seemingly plain and antiquated
Kamares ware. Specifically these two NT styles were the direct result
of specific innovations in pottery technology: better materials,
higher firing temperatures, and faster pottery wheels. Generally NT
vases were more slender and tapered at the base, and the novel form
of a stirrup jar became popular. As society evolved after the
devastation of 1,700 its changing art forms truly shows a shift in
the average patron's mentality. The background white so prominent on
previous styles of pottery was disregarded, replaced with darker
colors, spirals, and lines, and less commonly with plants and
animals. The Marine style often used animals to cover empty spaces, a
bronze age example of artists' horror vacui. The aesthetics of
individual fashion on Crete were rapidly changing throughout its
entire history, but a larger shift in the general style of pottery
during this period shows a larger societal change in the Minoans'
aesthetics.
|
The most famous Marine style jug with a decorative octopus, 1,500-1,400 BCE |
|
A marine style Minoan jug decorated with reeds, made around 1,400 BCE |
|
The most famous floral style Minoan jug, 1,550-1,500 BCE |
|
A Knossian palace style jug with an octopus, 1,500-1,400 BCE |
All
good things come to an end, and for the highly elaborate Minoan
pottery its end is in rigid formalism. Through the LM period artists
continued to make beautiful pieces, but in general starting around
1,400 BCE there is a trend toward a straight and formal depiction of
objects. This mirrored the trajectory of mainland Greek art, which
during this period came to dominate Crete, replacing native styles
with Mycenaean geometricism. Scenes of animals became simplified, and
then standardized across the island. The wealthy palace elite no
longer existed as a force for patronage as they once had a few
hundred years before. Without the propulsion of the upper class'
patronage expert artisans languished in obscurity.
|
A representative example of the decline in creative abstraction in late Minoan pottery, a Minoan jug made between 1,300-1,200 BCE |
|
A Mycenaean stirrup jar with an octopus made between 1,200-1,100 BCE. This style of octopus is distinctively Mycenaean and begins to appear across Crete (replacing the Minoan marine style of octopuses) between 1,380-1,000 BCE |
Novelty
continued as always to stay en vogue, as the period of Knossian
dominance from 1,470-1,380 heralded a new style called (who could
have guessed) “Palace Style”. During this period Mycenaean styles
were heavily imported into Crete, coming either through trade or
brought by Mycenaean conquerors. Mycenaean
pottery, while aesthetically different, was not stylistically bland.
New forms such as three handled amphorae, squat alabastron vessels,
ritual vessels with figure eight handles, and libation jugs with
spikes. Birds, helmets, and shields begin to appear on Cretan pottery
during this period. Similar to the 17th
century BCE trend of colonists and seafarers bringing ocean life onto
pottery, depictions of warfare show us artists trapped in a period of
bloody warfare. As the entire system collapsed around the turn of the
millennium, both Minoan and Mycenaean styles faded away, with minor
stylistic continuity preserved in small mountain holdouts.
This period heralds an emergence of a dark age Hellenic community
with an aesthetic sense distinct from its Mycenaean and Minoan
forebears.
|
A Palace Style jug from Katsampas, LM II period |
References
I appreciate everything you have added to my knowledge base.Admiring the time and effort you put into your blog and detailed information you offer.Thanks.
ReplyDeleteTitanium Necklaces
You do a great job. Congrats.
ReplyDeleteI really enjoyed this article as it pointed out a bunch of interesting points and made me think a little bit differently about the issue. I can't say that I agree completely, but you have many valid points and appreciate the thought and time you put into this post. Thanks for the great read. Meilleur courtier à montreal
ReplyDelete